A cadaveric assessment of the risk of nerve injury during open subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a bicortical guidewire

Purpose To evaluate the risk of neurological injury from the placement of a bicortical guidewire during subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Methods Ten forequarter cadaver specimens were evaluated. A bicortical guidewire was placed, and measurements to important local neurological structures were made wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 2858 - 2863
Main Authors Saithna, Adnan, Longo, Alison, Jordan, R. W., Leiter, Jeff, MacDonald, Peter, Old, Jason
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To evaluate the risk of neurological injury from the placement of a bicortical guidewire during subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Methods Ten forequarter cadaver specimens were evaluated. A bicortical guidewire was placed, and measurements to important local neurological structures were made with digital calipers at open dissection. Results The mean (range, SD) distances from the guidewire to the respective nerves was as follows: axillary nerve posteriorly, 15.7 mm (10–22 mm, 3.4); axillary nerve laterally, 18.7 mm (12–27 mm, 4.3); radial nerve posteriorly, 26.2 mm (16–35 mm, 7.0); radial nerve medially, 25 mm (16–33 mm, 4.4); and musculocutaneous nerve, 20.1 mm (12–26 mm, 5.2). Conclusions There has been some disagreement in the literature regarding the proximity of a bicortical guidewire to the axillary nerve posteriorly. The results of this study concur with reports from several other authors and demonstrate that this nerve is at risk of iatrogenic injury when using this technique. The clinical relevance of this work is to allow surgeons to better understand the proximity of the nerve to a bicortical guidewire and to highlight that this risk is avoided with a unicortical technique.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3972-2