Effect of Body Position on High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Variables and Final Manometric Diagnosis

According to the Chicago classification version 3.0, high-resolution manometry (HRM) should be performed in the supine position. However, with the patient in the upright/sitting position, the test could more closely simulate real-life behavior and may be better tolerated. We performed a systematic r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 335 - 343
Main Authors Riva, Carlo G, Siboni, Stefano, Ferrari, Davide, Sozzi, Marco, Capuzzo, Matteo, Asti, Emanuele, Ogliari, Cristina, Bonavina, Luigi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 30.07.2020
대한소화기 기능성질환∙운동학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:According to the Chicago classification version 3.0, high-resolution manometry (HRM) should be performed in the supine position. However, with the patient in the upright/sitting position, the test could more closely simulate real-life behavior and may be better tolerated. We performed a systematic review of the literature to search whether the manometric variables and the final diagnosis are affected by positional changes. A literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies published in English that compared HRM results in different body positions were included. Moreover, the change in diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders according to the shift of body position was investigated. Seventeen studies including 1714 patients and healthy volunteers met the inclusion criteria. Six studies showed a significant increase in lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure in the supine position. Integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the supine position in 10 of 13 studies. Distal contractile index was higher in the supine position in 9 out of 10 studies. One hundred and fifty-one patients (16.4%) out of 922 with normal HRM in the supine position were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) when the test was performed in the upright position ( < 0.001). Performing HRM in the upright position affects some variables and may change the final manometric diagnosis. Further studies to determine the normal values in the sitting position are needed.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
http://www.jnmjournal.org/journal/view.html?uid=1601&vmd=Full
ISSN:2093-0879
2093-0887
DOI:10.5056/jnm20010