Pharmacokinetics of elbasvir and grazoprevir in subjects with end-stage renal disease or severe renal impairment

Purpose To describe the phase 1 and population pharmacokinetic investigations that support dosing recommendations for elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in hepatitis C virus-infected people with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods This was an open-label, two-part, multiple-dose trial (MK-5172 PN050...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 75; no. 5; pp. 665 - 675
Main Authors Caro, Luzelena, Wenning, Larissa, Feng, Hwa-Ping, Guo, Zifang, Du, Lihong, Bhagunde, Pratik, Fandozzi, Christine, Panebianco, Deborah, Marshall, William L., Butterton, Joan R., Iwamoto, Marian, Yeh, Wendy W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To describe the phase 1 and population pharmacokinetic investigations that support dosing recommendations for elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in hepatitis C virus-infected people with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods This was an open-label, two-part, multiple-dose trial (MK-5172 PN050; NCT01937975) in 24 non–HCV-infected participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or severe renal impairment who received once-daily EBR 50 mg and GZR 100 mg for 10 days. Population pharmacokinetic analyses from the phase 3 C-SURFER study (PN052, NCT02092350) were also conducted. Results When comparing haemodialysis (HD) and non-HD days in participants with ESRD, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for EBR and GZR AUC 0–24 were 1.14 (1.08–1.21) and 0.97 (0.87–1.09). When comparing ESRD and healthy participants, GMRs (90% CIs) for EBR and GZR AUC 0–24 were 0.99 (0.75–1.30) and 0.83 (0.56–1.22) on HD days, and 0.86 (0.65–1.14) and 0.85 (0.58–1.25) on non-HD days. GMRs (90% CIs) for AUC 0–24 in participants with severe renal impairment relative to healthy controls were 1.65 (1.09–2.49) for GZR and 1.86 (1.38–2.51) for EBR. In population modelling of data from C-SURFER, absolute geometric means of steady-state EBR AUC 0–24 were 2.78 and 3.07 μM*h (HD and non-HD recipients) and GZR AUC 0–24 were 1.80 and 2.34 μM*h (HD and non-HD recipients). Conclusions EBR/GZR represents an important treatment option for HCV infection in people with severe renal impairment and those with ESRD. No dosage adjustment of EBR/GZR is required in people with any degree of renal impairment, including those receiving dialysis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-6970
1432-1041
1432-1041
DOI:10.1007/s00228-018-2585-3