Resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not depend on improved radiographic appearance of tumor–vessel relationships

Objective Neoadjuvant therapy increases rates of margin-negative resection of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BL-PDAC). Criteria for BL-PDAC resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) have not been clearly defined. Methods Fifty consecutive pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of radiation oncology Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 413 - 425
Main Authors Dholakia, Avani S., Hacker-Prietz, Amy, Wild, Aaron T., Raman, Siva P., Wood, Laura D., Huang, Peng, Laheru, Daniel A., Zheng, Lei, De Jesus-Acosta, Ana, Le, Dung T., Schulick, Richard, Edil, Barish, Ellsworth, Susannah, Pawlik, Timothy M., Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A., Hruban, Ralph H., Cameron, John L., Fishman, Elliot K., Wolfgang, Christopher L., Herman, Joseph M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Neoadjuvant therapy increases rates of margin-negative resection of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BL-PDAC). Criteria for BL-PDAC resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) have not been clearly defined. Methods Fifty consecutive patients with BL-PDAC who received NCRT from 2007 to 2012 were identified. Computed tomography (CT) scans pre- and post-treatment were centrally reviewed. Results Twenty-nine patients (58 %) underwent resection following NCRT, while 21 (42 %) remained unresected. Patients selected for and successfully undergoing resection were more likely to have better performance status and absence of the following features on pre- and post-treatment CT: superior mesenteric vein/portal vein encasement, superior mesenteric artery involvement, tumor involvement of two or more vessels, and questionable/overt metastases (all p  < 0.05). Tumor volume and degree of tumor–vessel involvement did not significantly change in both groups after NCRT (all p  > 0.05). The median overall survival was 22.9 months in resected versus 13.0 months in unresected patients ( p  < 0.001). Of patients undergoing resection, 93 % were margin-negative, 72 % were node-negative, and 54 % demonstrated moderate pathologic response to NCRT. Conclusion Apparent radiographic extent of vascular involvement does not change significantly after NCRT. Patients without metastatic disease should be chosen for surgical exploration based on adequate performance status and lack of disease progression.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
adejesu1@jhmi.edu
tpawlik1@jhmi.edu
cwolfga2@jhmi.edu
sbatkoy2@jhmi.edu
adholak1@jhmi.edu
phuang12@jhmi.edu
sraman3@jhmi.edu
jcameron@jhmi.edu
ahacker1@jhmi.edu
ldelong1@jhmi.edu
lzheng6@jhmi.edu
barish.edil@ucdenver.edu
Richard.schulick@ucdenver.edu
awild1@jhmi.edu
efishman@jhmi.edu
ciacobu@jhmi.edu
rhruban@jhmi.edu
laherda@jhmi.edu
dle@jhmi.edu
ISSN:1948-7894
1948-7908
DOI:10.1007/s13566-013-0115-6