Resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not depend on improved radiographic appearance of tumor–vessel relationships
Objective Neoadjuvant therapy increases rates of margin-negative resection of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BL-PDAC). Criteria for BL-PDAC resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) have not been clearly defined. Methods Fifty consecutive pati...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of radiation oncology Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 413 - 425 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.12.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
Neoadjuvant therapy increases rates of margin-negative resection of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BL-PDAC). Criteria for BL-PDAC resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) have not been clearly defined.
Methods
Fifty consecutive patients with BL-PDAC who received NCRT from 2007 to 2012 were identified. Computed tomography (CT) scans pre- and post-treatment were centrally reviewed.
Results
Twenty-nine patients (58 %) underwent resection following NCRT, while 21 (42 %) remained unresected. Patients selected for and successfully undergoing resection were more likely to have better performance status and absence of the following features on pre- and post-treatment CT: superior mesenteric vein/portal vein encasement, superior mesenteric artery involvement, tumor involvement of two or more vessels, and questionable/overt metastases (all
p
< 0.05). Tumor volume and degree of tumor–vessel involvement did not significantly change in both groups after NCRT (all
p
> 0.05). The median overall survival was 22.9 months in resected versus 13.0 months in unresected patients (
p
< 0.001). Of patients undergoing resection, 93 % were margin-negative, 72 % were node-negative, and 54 % demonstrated moderate pathologic response to NCRT.
Conclusion
Apparent radiographic extent of vascular involvement does not change significantly after NCRT. Patients without metastatic disease should be chosen for surgical exploration based on adequate performance status and lack of disease progression. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 adejesu1@jhmi.edu tpawlik1@jhmi.edu cwolfga2@jhmi.edu sbatkoy2@jhmi.edu adholak1@jhmi.edu phuang12@jhmi.edu sraman3@jhmi.edu jcameron@jhmi.edu ahacker1@jhmi.edu ldelong1@jhmi.edu lzheng6@jhmi.edu barish.edil@ucdenver.edu Richard.schulick@ucdenver.edu awild1@jhmi.edu efishman@jhmi.edu ciacobu@jhmi.edu rhruban@jhmi.edu laherda@jhmi.edu dle@jhmi.edu |
ISSN: | 1948-7894 1948-7908 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13566-013-0115-6 |