Research Transparency and Data Archiving for Experiments

Although still more common in medical studies and some other areas of social science such as psychology and behavioral economics, experimental work has become an increasingly important methodology in political science. Experimental work differs from other kinds of research because it systematically...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPS, political science & politics Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 67 - 71
Main Author McDermott, Rose
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although still more common in medical studies and some other areas of social science such as psychology and behavioral economics, experimental work has become an increasingly important methodology in political science. Experimental work differs from other kinds of research because it systematically administers a specific treatment to part of a population while withholding that manipulation from the rest of a subject pool. The best studies strive to keep all other aspects of the experiment similar, so that any emergent difference between the treatment and control group that emerge provide unparalleled traction in determining causal inference. Many other valuable forms of social research use observation of the natural world, rather than depending on intervention to advance understanding. Because experimentalists can create the environment or process they want to study, this strategy of intervention and manipulation constitutes the main distinction between experimental work and other forms of social observation.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1049-0965
1537-5935
DOI:10.1017/S1049096513001741