Mapping the History of Sociology: Places, Positioning, Dominance and Marginality in an Emerging Discipline

• Published in: Historická sociologie Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 11 - 27
• Main Authors: Reinprecht, Christoph, Walch, Nora, Šubrt, Jiří
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Czech
• Published: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Nakladatelství Karolinum 01.01.2019; Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press; Karolinum Press
• Subjects: empirical sociology; History; history of sociology; localization; marginalization; network; position, place; social field of science; Social history; sociology in Austria; Vienna; history of sociology; marginalization; localization; social field of science; position, place; sociology in Austria; Vienna; empirical sociology; network
• ISSN: 1804-0616; 2336-3525
• DOI: 10.14712/23363525.2019.2

The paper is a contribution to a sociological reading of a decisive moment in the history of Austrian and Viennese sociology: the early 20th century. In this early period of its establishment, the Austrian (and especially Viennese) sociology is known for its intellectual vitality, the diversity of its competing circles, its methodological innovations. At the same time, sociology appeared as a highly fragmented scientific field with dominant strands, today on the fringes of the discipline, and with peripheral and marginalized trends and positions, appreciated today as pioneers of modern sociology. By applying a topographic approach, the paper elaborates specific characteristics of this field, including the different degree of institutionalization in and outside the Universities, in connection with political and ideological struggles for discursive hegemony, or the deep gap between theoretical and empirical approaches, related to the effects of multidimensional and intersectional marginalization on protagonists of the sociological field who are today recognized as important innovators. With its focus on the material dimension of knowledge production and its particular attention to places and the localization of actors, methods, and thoughts, and the related (unequal) positions in the social field of science, the paper aims to contribute to a critical understanding of processes of marginalization as a constitutive, and driving, element in science history.