Comparing the diurnal variations in the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices SML and SMU

Diurnal variations of the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices (SML and SMU) were examined for the period of 1980-2010, and the differences between SML and SMU were especially analyzed. The diurnal variation of SML with a maximum at around 1100 UT has a prenoon- postnoon asymmetry. At solstices, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese science bulletin Vol. 59; no. 29-30; pp. 3877 - 3883
Main Authors Wang, Yuan, Du, Aimin, Chen, Gengxiong, Cao, Xin, Zhang, Ying, Li, Min, Liu, Xiaocan, Guo, Jianpeng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.10.2014
Science China Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diurnal variations of the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices (SML and SMU) were examined for the period of 1980-2010, and the differences between SML and SMU were especially analyzed. The diurnal variation of SML with a maximum at around 1100 UT has a prenoon- postnoon asymmetry. At solstices, the diurnal variation of SML is much stronger than that at equinoxes. For the SMU, two maxima are recorded in the diurnal variation with the bigger one at 1700 UT and the smaller one at 0400 UT. The seasonal variations are not obvious in the UT variation characteristics of SMU although the intensity of SMU is changed remarkably season by season. For both SML and SMU, the contributing stations are located at higher geomagnetic latitude around 1600 UT and at lower geomagnetic latitude around 0400 UT. These results indicate that:(1) the SML is mostly controlled by the convection electric field. Its diurnal variation is mainly correlated with the equinoctial and R-M hypothesis; (2) the SMU is largely controlled by the ionospheric conductance. Its diurnal variation is tightly correlated with the solar radiation.
Bibliography:Diurnal variations of the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices (SML and SMU) were examined for the period of 1980-2010, and the differences between SML and SMU were especially analyzed. The diurnal variation of SML with a maximum at around 1100 UT has a prenoon- postnoon asymmetry. At solstices, the diurnal variation of SML is much stronger than that at equinoxes. For the SMU, two maxima are recorded in the diurnal variation with the bigger one at 1700 UT and the smaller one at 0400 UT. The seasonal variations are not obvious in the UT variation characteristics of SMU although the intensity of SMU is changed remarkably season by season. For both SML and SMU, the contributing stations are located at higher geomagnetic latitude around 1600 UT and at lower geomagnetic latitude around 0400 UT. These results indicate that:(1) the SML is mostly controlled by the convection electric field. Its diurnal variation is mainly correlated with the equinoctial and R-M hypothesis; (2) the SMU is largely controlled by the ionospheric conductance. Its diurnal variation is tightly correlated with the solar radiation.
11-1785/N
Auroral electrojet ; SuperMAG Diurnal variation ; SML index ; SMU index
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0451-y
ISSN:1001-6538
1861-9541
DOI:10.1007/s11434-014-0451-y