Preliminary validation of the military low back pain questionnaire

• Published in: Military medicine Vol. 179; no. 2; pp. 121 - 125
• Main Authors: Roy, Tanja C, Fish, Karen L, Lopez, Heather P, Piva, Sara R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01.02.2014
• Subjects: Adult; Area Under Curve; Armed forces; Armor; Back pain; Disability Evaluation; Employment; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain - diagnosis; Male; Military Personnel; Military vehicles; Patients; Physical therapists; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; ROC Curve; Social life & customs; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; Validity; Young Adult; United States; United States > US
• ISSN: 0026-4075; 1930-613X
• DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00341

Soldiers must perform a variety of physical tasks that the civilian population does not. The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (M-ODI) is the most widely used measure of function in patients with low back pain but does not include military tasks. The Military Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MBQ) was developed by military Physical Therapists to include tasks such as wearing body armor. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary evidence for the reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the MBQ in nondeployed Soldiers. The MBQ had good reliability compared to the M-ODI. The inter-rater correlation coefficient for the M-ODI was 0.79 and 0.75 for the MBQ. Cronbach's alpha was 0.75 and 0.85 for the M-ODI and MBQ, respectively. The minimal detectable change for the M-ODI was 21.03 and 22.97 for the MBQ. Responsiveness was assessed using a global rating of change; area under the curve for the M-ODI was 0.82 and 0.90 for the MBQ. The correlation between the M-ODI and the MBQ was r = 0.80 indicating good concurrent validity. The MBQ was as reliable as the M-ODI in an Army population. There were trends in the psychometrics suggesting the MBQ may be more sensitive to change than the M-ODI in this population.