Noninvasive Monitoring of Dynamic Cerebrovascular Autoregulation and ‘Optimal Blood Pressure’ in Normal Adult Subjects
Background Cerebrovascular autoregulation can be continuously monitored from slow fluctuations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the index of dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation (TOx) and the associated ‘op...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurocritical care Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 201 - 206 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.02.2019
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Cerebrovascular autoregulation can be continuously monitored from slow fluctuations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO
2
). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the index of dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation (TOx) and the associated ‘optimal’ ABP in normal adult healthy subjects.
Methods
Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were studied. TOx was calculated as the moving correlation coefficient between spontaneous fluctuations of ABP and rSO
2
. ABP was measured with the Finometer photoplethysmograph. The ABP with optimal autoregulation (ABP
OPT
) was also determined as the ABP level with the lowest associated TOx (opt-TOx).
Results
Average rSO
2
and TOx was 72.3 ± 2.9% and 0.05 ± 0.18, respectively. Two subjects had impaired autoregulation with a TOx > 0.3. The opt-TOx was − 0.1 ± 0.26. ABP
OPT
was 87.0 ± 16.7 mmHg. The difference between ABP and ABP
OPT
was − 0.3 ± 7.5 mmHg. In total, 44% of subjects had a deviation of ABP from ABP
OPT
exceeding 5 mmHg. ABP
OPT
ranged from 57 to 117 mmHg.
Conclusions
TOx in healthy volunteers on average displays intact autoregulation and ABP close to ABP
OPT
. However, some subjects have possible autoregulatory dysfunction or a significant deviation of ABP from ABP
OPT
, which may confer a susceptibility to neurological injury. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1541-6933 1556-0961 1556-0961 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12028-018-0600-2 |