Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Introduction A subset of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) require eventual conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to complications from SG or to enhance weight loss. The aim of this study is to characterize the indications for conversion and perioperative outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inObesity surgery Vol. 28; no. 12; pp. 3843 - 3850
Main Authors Landreneau, Joshua P., Strong, Andrew T., Rodriguez, John H., Aleassa, Essa M., Aminian, Ali, Brethauer, Stacy, Schauer, Philip R., Kroh, Matthew D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction A subset of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) require eventual conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to complications from SG or to enhance weight loss. The aim of this study is to characterize the indications for conversion and perioperative outcomes in a large cohort of these patients at a single institution. Methods Patients who underwent revisional surgery to convert SG to RYGB at our institution from January 2008 through January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Eighty-nine patients with previous SG underwent conversion to RYGB as part of a planned two-stage approach to gastric bypass ( n  = 36), for weight recidivism ( n  = 11), or for complications related to SG ( n  = 42). Complications from SG that warranted conversion included refractory GERD (40.5%), sleeve stenosis (31.0%), gastrocutaneous (16.7%), or gastropleural (7.1%) fistula, and gastric torsion (4.1%). The mean (SD) age was 47.2 years (11.4 years) and median BMI at the time of revision was 43.2 kg/m 2 . A laparoscopic approach was successfully completed in 76 patients (85.4%), with an additional of four completed robotically (4.5%). The median length of stay was 3 days. Twenty-eight patients (31.5%) had complications which included surgical site infection (20.2%), re-operation (6.7%), anastomotic stricture (3.4%), and one pulmonary embolism. There were no mortalities with a median follow-up of 15 months. Conclusions Conversion of SG to RYGB is safe and technically feasible when performed for complications of SG or to enhance weight loss. This operation can be successfully performed laparoscopically with a low rate of conversion and reasonable complication profile.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3435-1