Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques

Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arteri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStroke (1970) Vol. 36; no. 9; pp. e83 - e99
Main Authors Wintermark, Max, Sesay, Musa, Barbier, Emmanuel, Borbély, Katalin, Dillon, William P, Eastwood, James D, Glenn, Thomas C, Grandin, Cécile B, Pedraza, Salvador, Soustiel, Jean-François, Nariai, Tadashi, Zaharchuk, Greg, Caillé, Jean-Marie, Dousset, Vincent, Yonas, Howard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arterial spin labeling, and Doppler ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume. All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks. This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques. For clinicians, this article should offer a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques and assist them in choosing the proper method for every specific clinical setting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/01.str.0000177884.72657.8b