Nanofiltration modeling: a comparative study of the salt filtration performance of a charged ceramic membrane and an organic nanofilter using the computer simulation program nanoflux
The results of a detailed experimental and theoretical study of the rejection of single salts and multi-electrolyte mixtures by a loose ceramic TiO 2 (SCT Membralox®) membrane at the borderline between ultra- and nanofiltration (NF) are compared with similar results obtained using a tighter organic...
Saved in:
Published in | Separation and purification technology Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 117 - 126 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.07.2003
Elsevier Science Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The results of a detailed experimental and theoretical study of the rejection of single salts and multi-electrolyte mixtures by a loose ceramic TiO
2 (SCT Membralox®) membrane at the borderline between ultra- and nanofiltration (NF) are compared with similar results obtained using a tighter organic nanofilter (NF200). Theoretical ion rejection predictions for multi-electrolyte solutions are obtained by solving numerically the hindered transport extended Nernst–Planck (ENP) ion flux equations using our computer simulation program,
nanoflux
, which incorporates electrostatic, steric, and hydrodynamic interactions and a new choice for ion size (bare crystal, or Pauling, radius). We find that, depending on the operating conditions, the looser ceramic nanofilter does not necessarily perform less well than the tighter organic one. We also examine how well the rejection of multi-electrolyte mixtures can be predicted by hindered electro-transport theory (HETT), using a database of single salt results, over a wide range of relative salt mole proportions and pH. Finally, we propose a combined experimental and theoretical method for characterizing, simulating, and optimizing the performance of charged nanofilters using the computer program
nanoflux. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1383-5866 1873-3794 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00076-5 |