Increased cell numbers improve marine biodegradation tests for persistence assessment

Currently available OECD biodegradation screening tests (BSTs) are not particularly suited for persistence screening. Their duration can be much less than international half-life thresholds for persistence and they are variable and stringent, therefore prone to false negatives. The present study ext...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 706; p. 135621
Main Authors Ott, Amelie, Martin, Timothy J., Snape, Jason R., Davenport, Russell J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Currently available OECD biodegradation screening tests (BSTs) are not particularly suited for persistence screening. Their duration can be much less than international half-life thresholds for persistence and they are variable and stringent, therefore prone to false negatives. The present study extended test durations beyond 28 days and increased biomass concentrations for marine BSTs to better represent the microbial diversity inherent in the sampled environment. For this so-called environmentally relevant BST (erBST) marine cell concentrations were nominally increased 100-fold by tangential flow filtration. The marine erBST was validated against a standard BST using five 14C labeled reference compounds with a range of biodegradation potentials (aniline, 4-fluorophenol, 4-nitrophenol, 4-chloroaniline and pentachlorophenol) in a modified OECD 301B test. A full mass balance was collated to follow chemical fate in the tests. The erBST was more accurate and less variable than the comparator BST in assigning the reference compounds to their expected biodegradation classifications (non-persistent or potentially persistent). According to the REACH non-persistence criterion of ≥60% biodegradation over 60 days, the erBST correctly classified 60% of chemical replicates according to their expected biodegradation classification and had a coefficient of variation of 21% between replicates. In contrast, the BST correctly assessed 40% of reference chemicals in regards to their expected biodegradation classification with a coefficient of variation of 36%. All non-persistent chemicals showed increased degradation in the erBST, except for 4-chloroaniline, which did not degrade in either BST or erBST. Both tests showed no false positive results, correctly classifying the negative control pentachlorophenol as potentially persistent. Next, it is recommended to further validate the marine erBST in an inter-laboratory study incorporating different seawater sources to fully assess its variability and reliability. [Display omitted] •Current biodegradation screening tests were not designed for persistence assessment.•These current tests often give false negative results and are highly variable.•This study validated a new test to assess chemical degradation in seawater.•New test incorporates increased bacterial cell numbers and runs beyond 60 days.•New test is less variable and provides more reliable persistence assessment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135621