Recovering phosphate and energy from anaerobic sludge digested wastewater with iron-air fuel cells: Two-chamber cell versus one-chamber cell

Anaerobic sludge digested (ASD) wastewater is widespread in wastewater treatment plants. Recovering phosphate from ASD wastewater not only removes pollutants but also solves the phosphorus deficiency problem. Iron-air fuel cells were chosen to recover phosphate and generate electricity from ASD wast...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 825; p. 154034
Main Authors Wang, Ru, Wan, Sizhuo, Lai, Lingling, Zhang, Meng, Zeb, Bibi Saima, Qaisar, Mahmood, Tan, Guotao, Yuan, Linjiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Anaerobic sludge digested (ASD) wastewater is widespread in wastewater treatment plants. Recovering phosphate from ASD wastewater not only removes pollutants but also solves the phosphorus deficiency problem. Iron-air fuel cells were chosen to recover phosphate and generate electricity from ASD wastewater. To optimize cell configuration, a two-chamber and a one-chamber iron-air fuel cell were set up. The phosphate removal efficiency, the vivianite yield and the electricity generation efficiency of the two fuel cells were evaluated. It turned out that the volumetric removal rate (VRR) of phosphate of the two-chamber cell was 11.60 mg P·L−1·h−1, which was about five times of that in the one-chamber cell. The phosphate recovery product vivianite was detected on the surface of the iron anodes and the calculated purities of the two-chamber fuel cell and one-chamber fuel cell were 90.6% and 58.7%, respectively. Considering the content and purity, the iron anode surface in the two-chamber fuel cell was the best point to recover phosphate. The proton exchange membrane (PEM) in the two-chamber fuel cell provided low pH conditions suitable for vivianite formation. Moreover, under the low pH condition, metal ions of Fe2+, Ca2+, Al3+ and so on were kept soluble, leading to a high conductivity. The high conductivity caused low internal resistance, which benefited the electricity generation. The total output electric power of the two-chamber fuel cell was 2.4 times that of the one-chamber fuel cell when treating 25 mL ASD wastewater (0.62 vs. 0.26 mW·h). Overall, the two-chamber fuel cell was the better choice for phosphate recovery and electricity generation from ASD wastewater. Further studies on the long-term operation of two-chamber fuel cells should be carried out. [Display omitted] •PO43− removal was 5× higher in two-chamber than one-chamber fuel cell.•Vivianite should be recovered from the iron-anode surface in two-chamber fuel cell.•The output electric power was 2.4× higher in two-chamber than one-chamber cell.•Two-chamber cell was more suitable to recover P and electricity from ASD wastewater.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154034