Association of oral contraceptives use and lung cancer risk among women: an updated meta-analysis based on cohort and case-control studies

• Published in: Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 1205 - 1210
• Main Authors: Wu, Wei, Yin, Zhi-Hua, Guan, Peng, Ren, Yang-Wu, Zhou, Bao-Sen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thailand 01.01.2014
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Contraceptives, Oral - adverse effects; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors
• ISSN: 1513-7368; 2476-762X
• DOI: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1205

Previous studies on the association of oral contraceptives (OC) use and lung cancer generated inconsistent findings. The aim of this study was to confirm any definite correlation between OC use and lung cancer risk. Publications were reviewed and obtained through PubMed and EMBASE databases literature search up to November, 2013. Reference lists from retrieved articles were also reviewed. The language of publication was restricted to English. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association by calculating pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 14 studies consisting of 9 case- control studies and 5 cohort studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant association observed between OC use and lung cancer risk in the overall analysis (OR=0.91; 95% CI=0.81-1.03). There was a significant protective effect in Europe (OR=0.74; 95% CI=0.60-0.91) and a borderline significant protective effect with an adenocarcinoma histology (OR=0.90; 95% CI=0.80-1.01) in subgroup analyses. No association was observed for methodological quality of study, study design, smoking status and case number of study. This meta-analysis suggests that OC use is not likely to be associated with the risk of lung cancer at all. While a significant protective effect of OC use on lung cancer was observed in Europe, interpretation should be cautious because of the potential biases of low-quality studies. At the same time, more attention should be paid to the possible association of OC use with adenocarcinoma of lung. Our findings require further research, with well-conducted and large-scale epidemiological studies to confirm effects of OC use on lung cancer.