Optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas exploration: From production to transmission

• Published in: Energy (Oxford) Vol. 183; pp. 651 - 669
• Main Authors: Oke, Doris, Mukherjee, Rajib, Sengupta, Debalina, Majozi, Thokozani, El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 15.09.2019; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Case studies; Continuous-time formulation; Design specifications; Distillation; Distilled water; Electric power; Electric power distribution; Electric power generation; Energy; Energy requirements; Energy transmission; Gas production; Mathematical analysis; Membrane distillation; Natural gas; Natural gas exploration; Oil and gas exploration; Oil and gas production; Optimization; Reduction; Regeneration; Residential energy; Shale; Shale gas; Superstructures; Treated water; Water; Water treatment; Water; Continuous-time formulation; Energy; Membrane distillation; Optimization; Shale gas
• ISSN: 0360-5442; 1873-6785
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.104

This work presents a mathematical framework for optimizing water-energy nexus during shale gas production, processing, distribution, usage in power generation, and transmission of produced power. The framework entails a superstructure-based mathematical formulation. Regeneration is achieved using membrane distillation (MD), whereby the treated water can be reused at the next fracturing operation. The developed model incorporates a detailed design model of MD to account for the design specifications and energy requirements of the water regenerator. Hence, water, energy, operating and/or capital cost are optimized simultaneously. The study considers natural gas as fuel for commercial, industrial and residential customers, as well as for electric power generation, with the goal of maximizing the overall profit. The resultant model is applied to a case study, which is a representative of Marcellus shale play. The approach results in 23.2% reduction in freshwater utilization, 18.6% reduction in the freshwater cost and 42.7% reduction in the energy requirement of the regenerator. The energy requirement for regeneration is 160 × 103 kJ/m3 of water. The results indicate that the cost incurred in the network involving wet gas is 41.76% higher than the network involving dry gas due to the processing requirement of wet gas. •Tightness in schedule encouraged effective flowback water reuse.•Steady supply of gas to meet market demand due to tightness in fracturing schedule.•Significant reduction in the energy required by the regenerator using the approach.•The cost of shale gas production is the primal cost in the overall network.•The type of gas produced in a region has effect on the infrastructure development.