Effect of Magnetic Baffles and Magnetic Nanofluid on Thermo-Hydraulic Characteristics of Dimple Mini Channel for Thermal Energy Applications

• Published in: Sustainability Vol. 14; no. 16; p. 10419
• Main Authors: Souayeh, Basma, Bhattacharyya, Suvanjan, Hdhiri, Najib, Hammami, Fayçal, Yasin, Essam, Raju, S. Suresh Kumar, Alam, Mir Waqas, Alsheddi, Tarfa, Al Nuwairan, Muneerah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2022
• Subjects: Baffles; Computational fluid dynamics; Computer applications; Dimpling; Efficiency; Equipment and supplies; Field strength; Fluid dynamics; Fluid flow; Geometry; Heat conductivity; Heat exchangers; Heat transfer; Hydraulics; Hydrodynamics; Iron oxides; Magnetic fields; Magnetic materials; Nanofluids; Nanoparticles; Pressure; Pressure drop; Reynolds number; Sustainability; Thermal energy; Turbulence; Velocity coupling; Vortices; Working fluids; Saudi Arabia
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su141610419

The combined effect of a magnetic baffle and a dimple turbulator on the heat transfer and pressure drop is investigated computationally in a mini channel. Fe3O4 magnetic nanofluid is used as a working fluid. The Reynolds number (Re) is varied from 150 to 210 and the magnetic field intensities range from 1200 G to 2000 G. Finite-volume based commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver ANSYS-Fluent 18.1 was used for the numerical simulations. A laminar viscous model is used with pressure-velocity coupling along with second-order upwind discretization and QUICK scheme for discretizing the momentum and energy equations. The results show that there is an increase of 3.53%, 10.77%, and 25.39% in the Nusselt numbers when the magnetic fields of 1200 G, 1500 G and 2000 G, respectively, are applied at x = 15 mm, as compared to the flow without a magnetic field when the pitch = 10 mm. These values change to 1.51%, 6.14% and 18.47% for a pitch = 5 mm and 0.85%, 4.33%, and 15.25% for a pitch = 2.5 mm, when compared to the flow without a magnetic field in the respective geometries. When the two sources are placed at x = 7.5 mm and 15 mm, there is an increase of 4.52%, 13.93%, and 33.08% in the Nusselt numbers when magnetic fields of 1200 G, 1500 G, and 2000 G are applied when the pitch = 10 mm. The increment changed to 1.82%, 8.16%, and 22.31% for a pitch = 5 mm and 1.01%, 5.96%, and 21.38% for a pitch = 2.5 mm. This clearly shows that the two sources at the front have a higher increment in the Nusselt numbers compared to one source, due to higher turbulence. In addition, there is a decrease in the pressure drop of 10.82%, 16.778%, and 26.75% when magnetic fields of 1200 G, 1500 G, and 2000 G, respectively, are applied at x = 15 mm, as compared to flow without magnetic field when the pitch = 10 mm. These values change to 2.46%, 4.98%, and 8.54% for a pitch = 5 mm and 1.62%, 3.52%, and 4.78% for a pitch = 2.5 mm, when compared to flow without magnetic field in the respective geometries. When two sources are placed at x = 7.5 mm and 15 mm, there is an decrease of 19.02%, 31.3%, and 50.34% in the pressure drop when the magnetic fields of 1200 G, 1500 G and 2000 G are applied when the pitch = 10 mm. These values change to 4.18%, 9.52%, and 16.52% for a pitch = 5 mm and 3.08%, 6.88%, and 14.88% for a pitch = 2.5 mm. Hence, with the increase in the magnetic field, there is a decrease in pressure drop for both the cases and the pitches. This trend is valid only at lower magnetic field strength, because the decrease in the pressure drop dominates over the increase in pressure drop due to turbulence.