Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Enhanced Thrombolysis A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies

Background and Purpose— Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis is a promising new approach to facilitate reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. So far, 3 different ultrasound technologies were used to increase the thrombolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), including transcrania...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStroke (1970) Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 280 - 287
Main Authors Tsivgoulis, Georgios, Eggers, Jürgen, Ribo, Marc, Perren, Fabienne, Saqqur, Maher, Rubiera, Marta, Sergentanis, Theodoros N., Vadikolias, Konstantinos, Larrue, Vincent, Molina, Carlos A., Alexandrov, Andrei V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.02.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Purpose— Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis is a promising new approach to facilitate reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. So far, 3 different ultrasound technologies were used to increase the thrombolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), including transcranial Doppler (TCD), transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD), and low-frequency ultrasound. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis compared to the current standard of care (intravenous tPA). Subjects and Methods— Through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database search, we identified and abstracted all studies of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in acute cerebral ischemia. Principal investigators were contacted if data not available through peer-reviewed publication were needed. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization rates were compared between tPA, tPA+TCD±microspheres (μS), tPA+TCCD±μS, and tPA+low-frequency ultrasound. Results— A total of 6 randomized (n=224) and 3 nonrandomized (n=192) studies were identified. The rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in randomized studies were as follows: tPA+TCD, 3.8% (95% CI, 0%–11.2%); tPA+TCCD, 11.1% (95% CI, 0%–28.9%); tPA+low-frequency ultrasound, 35.7% (95% CI, 16.2%– 61.4%); and tPA alone, 2.9% (95% CI, 0%–8.4%). Complete recanalization rates were higher in patients receiving combination of TCD with tPA 37.2% (95% CI, 26.5%– 47.9%) compared with patients treated with tPA alone 17.2% (95% CI, 9.5%–24.9%). In 8 trials of high-frequency (TCD/TCCD) ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis, tPA+TCD/TCCD±μS was associated with a higher likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.70–5.25; P =0.0001) when compared to tPA alone. High-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis was not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (pooled OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.44–3.60; P =0.67). Conclusions— The present safety and signal-of-efficacy data of high-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis should be taken into account in the design of future randomized controlled trials.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563304