Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Enhanced Thrombolysis A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies
Background and Purpose— Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis is a promising new approach to facilitate reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. So far, 3 different ultrasound technologies were used to increase the thrombolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), including transcrania...
Saved in:
Published in | Stroke (1970) Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 280 - 287 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hagerstown, MD
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
01.02.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Purpose—
Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis is a promising new approach to facilitate reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. So far, 3 different ultrasound technologies were used to increase the thrombolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), including transcranial Doppler (TCD), transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD), and low-frequency ultrasound. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis compared to the current standard of care (intravenous tPA).
Subjects and Methods—
Through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database search, we identified and abstracted all studies of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in acute cerebral ischemia. Principal investigators were contacted if data not available through peer-reviewed publication were needed. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization rates were compared between tPA, tPA+TCD±microspheres (μS), tPA+TCCD±μS, and tPA+low-frequency ultrasound.
Results—
A total of 6 randomized (n=224) and 3 nonrandomized (n=192) studies were identified. The rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in randomized studies were as follows: tPA+TCD, 3.8% (95% CI, 0%–11.2%); tPA+TCCD, 11.1% (95% CI, 0%–28.9%); tPA+low-frequency ultrasound, 35.7% (95% CI, 16.2%– 61.4%); and tPA alone, 2.9% (95% CI, 0%–8.4%). Complete recanalization rates were higher in patients receiving combination of TCD with tPA 37.2% (95% CI, 26.5%– 47.9%) compared with patients treated with tPA alone 17.2% (95% CI, 9.5%–24.9%). In 8 trials of high-frequency (TCD/TCCD) ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis, tPA+TCD/TCCD±μS was associated with a higher likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.70–5.25;
P
=0.0001) when compared to tPA alone. High-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis was not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (pooled OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.44–3.60;
P
=0.67).
Conclusions—
The present safety and signal-of-efficacy data of high-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis should be taken into account in the design of future randomized controlled trials. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0039-2499 1524-4628 1524-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563304 |