Associations between the effort-reward imbalance model of workplace stress and indices of cardiovascular health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•ERI and OC were most associated with IMT and fibrinogen.•Sex moderates the association between OC and both IMT and mean BP.•OC moderates the association between ERI and fibrinogen.•‘White coat effect’ may explain disparity in ERI and hypertension associations. Work stress can increase the risk of c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 83; pp. 252 - 266
Main Authors Eddy, Pennie, Wertheim, Eleanor H., Kingsley, Michael, Wright, Bradley J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•ERI and OC were most associated with IMT and fibrinogen.•Sex moderates the association between OC and both IMT and mean BP.•OC moderates the association between ERI and fibrinogen.•‘White coat effect’ may explain disparity in ERI and hypertension associations. Work stress can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease by 50%, with increasing research focusing on the underlying mechanisms responsible for these associations. Our meta-analysis assessed the associations of the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) workplace stress model with indices of cardiovascular disease. The search term ‘effort*reward*imbalance’ produced 22 papers (129 associations, N=93,817) meeting inclusion criteria. Greater ERI was most associated with increased hypertension (r=0.26, p<0.001, N=1180), intima media thickness (r=0.23, p<.001, N=828) and fibrinogen (r=0.13, p=0.03, N=4315). Trait over-commitment was most associated with increased hypertension (r=0.24, p=0.02, N=899) and intima media thickness (r=0.19, p=0.02, N=828). Interventions aimed at reducing the impact of ERI and over-commitment on cardiovascular disease should consider concurrently assessing changes in physiological markers of cardiovascular disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.025