NISP, Bone Fragmentation, and the Measurement of Taxonomic Abundance

Zooarchaeologists have long recognized that the number of identified specimens (NISP) is dependent on the degree to which bones are fragmented, but attempts are rarely made to control for the effects of fragmentation on NISP. This paper provides insight into those effects by presenting both a formal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of archaeological method and theory Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 397 - 419
Main Author Cannon, Michael D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer Science+Business Media 01.09.2013
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Anthropology
Archaeological methodology
Archaeology
Archaeozoology
Bone density
Bones
Data analysis
Digital images
Digital imaging
Experimental archaeology
Mathematical functions
Paleobiology
Proportions
Reliability functions
Social Sciences
Specimens
Survival rates
Taxa
Taxonomy
Zooarchaeology
Zoology
United States > US
Zooarchaeology
Experimental archaeology
Digital image analysis
Taphonomy
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Zooarchaeologists have long recognized that the number of identified specimens (NISP) is dependent on the degree to which bones are fragmented, but attempts are rarely made to control for the effects of fragmentation on NISP. This paper provides insight into those effects by presenting both a formal model of the relationship between NISP and fragmentation and experimental data on that relationship. The experimental data have practical implications regarding the effectiveness of potential measures of bone fragmentation, suggesting that specimen size—which can be determined easily through digital image analysis—is more useful than other variables that have been or might be used as fragmentation measures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1072-5369
1573-7764
DOI:10.1007/s10816-012-9166-z