Party-directed personalisation: the role of candidate selection in campaign personalisation in Hungary

This article aims to capture the effect of candidate selection on campaign personalisation during two Hungarian general elections (2010 and 2014). Our main hypothesis is that candidates who think their selection was mostly influenced by the national party leadership (i.e. it was centralised and at t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEast European politics Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 466 - 486
Main Authors Papp, Zsófia, Zorigt, Burtejin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 01.10.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article aims to capture the effect of candidate selection on campaign personalisation during two Hungarian general elections (2010 and 2014). Our main hypothesis is that candidates who think their selection was mostly influenced by the national party leadership (i.e. it was centralised and at the same time exclusive) pursue less personalised campaigns than those who think that other actors played a major role in candidate selection. By using data from the Comparative Candidates Survey, we show that centralised and exclusive selection practices affect personalisation in Hungary. The main finding of this article is that - besides its main effect - candidate selection affects the personalisation of various groups of candidates (local politicians and national party leaders) in different ways. The result confirms that centralisation and exclusiveness in candidate selection is definitely important in shaping how candidates approach campaign personalisation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2159-9165
2159-9173
DOI:10.1080/21599165.2016.1215303