Comparison of prediction methods for oxygen-18 isotope composition in shallow groundwater
Groundwater is the most important source of drinking water in the world. Therefore, information on the quality and quantity is important, as is new information related to the characteristics of the aquifer and the recharge area. In the present study we focused on the isotope composition of oxygen (δ...
Saved in:
Published in | The Science of the total environment Vol. 631-632; pp. 358 - 368 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.08.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Groundwater is the most important source of drinking water in the world. Therefore, information on the quality and quantity is important, as is new information related to the characteristics of the aquifer and the recharge area. In the present study we focused on the isotope composition of oxygen (δ18O) in groundwater, which is a natural tracer and provides a better understanding of the water cycle, in terms of origin, dynamics and interaction. The groundwater δ18O at 83 locations over the entire Slovenian territory was studied. Each location was sampled twice during the period 2009–2011. Geostatistical tools (such us ordinary kriging, simple and multiple linear regressions, and artificial neural networks were used and compared to select the best tool. Measured values of δ18O in the groundwater were used as the dependent variable, while the spatial characteristics of the territory (elevation, distance from the sea and average annual precipitation) were used as independent variables. Based on validation data sets, the artificial neural network model proved to be the most suitable method for predicting δ18O in the groundwater, since it produced the smallest deviations from the real/measured values in groundwater.
[Display omitted]
•Isotopic composition of oxygen (δ18O) in groundwater in shallow aquifers was investigated.•83 groundwater sampling points during dry and wet periods (2009–2011)•Different prediction models were used for prediction of δ18O spatial distribution.•Model parameters: distance from sea, elevation, and amount of precipitation•Best groundwater δ18O prediction model is artificial neural network. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.033 |