Bio-fortification of iron and zinc improves the biomass, uptake, distribution and yield of different maize varieties

Different approaches are underway to enrich the crops with nutrients to fulfill the nutrition requirement. This study was performed to investigate the impact of Zn and Fe bio-fortification on different maize varieties. Four maize varieties: V 1 (Pak 2); V 2 (Golden); V 3 (Sultan); V 4 (Pearl) and th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of plant nutrition Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 120 - 129
Main Authors Qureshi, Muhammad Tamoor, Iqbal, Nasir, Noorka, Ijaz Rasool, Waheed, Hasnain
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Taylor & Francis 17.08.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Different approaches are underway to enrich the crops with nutrients to fulfill the nutrition requirement. This study was performed to investigate the impact of Zn and Fe bio-fortification on different maize varieties. Four maize varieties: V 1 (Pak 2); V 2 (Golden); V 3 (Sultan); V 4 (Pearl) and three treatments: T 1 (control-untreated), T 2 (Iron 7 mg/L as FeSO 4 .7H 2 O) and T 3 (Zinc 10 mg/L as ZnSO 4 .5H 2 O) were used. The variety V 2 performed better and produced highest biomass, leaf area, seed yield, total iron (TIC) and zinc concentration (TZC). In case of trace elements, maximum biomass, leaf area and seed yield was observed under T 3 . Moreover, highest TIC (62.90 mg kg −1 ) and TZC (65.80 mg kg −1 ) was measured with T 2 and T 3 , respectively. The highest iron and zinc in stover (33.14 & 33.79 mg kg −1 ) and grain (29.75 & 32.00 mg kg −1 ) were determined with T 2 and T 3 , respectively. In these experiments, V 2 produced highest net income (NI) (615.02 US $ha −1 ) and among trace elements, T 3 gave maximum NI (629.83 US $ha −1 ). Overall, maize varieties with T 3 had 24% higher NI than T 1 . As growth, yield and NI were improved with V 2 under T 3 , therefore this combination was most effective for maize production.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0190-4167
1532-4087
1532-4087
DOI:10.1080/01904167.2020.1806309