On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG

•Retro-cues protect working memory precision against interference/distraction.•Retro-cues lead to lower posterior N1 amplitudes referred to distractor processing.•P3b referred to the distractor display is suppressed following a retro-cue.•ERP results reveal that retro-cues inhibit working memory enc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological psychology Vol. 124; pp. 47 - 56
Main Authors Schneider, Daniel, Barth, Anna, Getzmann, Stephan, Wascher, Edmund
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Retro-cues protect working memory precision against interference/distraction.•Retro-cues lead to lower posterior N1 amplitudes referred to distractor processing.•P3b referred to the distractor display is suppressed following a retro-cue.•ERP results reveal that retro-cues inhibit working memory encoding of distractors. This EEG study investigated the protective effect of retroactive attentional focusing on working memory. To this effect, we used a visuo-spatial working memory task and presented block-wise distractor displays after working memory contents had been updated by means of a retroactive cue (retro-cue). Retroactive attention attenuated the interfering effect of distractors on memory precision. The reduction of working memory load by means of a selective retro-cue was reflected by a decline of a negative slow wave over parietal sites. Posterior N1 to the distractor was reduced following a selective retro-cue compared to a neutral retro-cue condition, most notably at left hemispheric sites. P3b referred to the distractor was suppressed completely only following a selective retro-cue. This suggests that focusing on only a subset of visuo-spatial information represented in working memory releases cognitive resources for preventing the in-depth processing of subsequently irrelevant visual events, thereby inhibiting their transfer into working memory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-0511
1873-6246
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.006