On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG
•Retro-cues protect working memory precision against interference/distraction.•Retro-cues lead to lower posterior N1 amplitudes referred to distractor processing.•P3b referred to the distractor display is suppressed following a retro-cue.•ERP results reveal that retro-cues inhibit working memory enc...
Saved in:
Published in | Biological psychology Vol. 124; pp. 47 - 56 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.03.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Retro-cues protect working memory precision against interference/distraction.•Retro-cues lead to lower posterior N1 amplitudes referred to distractor processing.•P3b referred to the distractor display is suppressed following a retro-cue.•ERP results reveal that retro-cues inhibit working memory encoding of distractors.
This EEG study investigated the protective effect of retroactive attentional focusing on working memory. To this effect, we used a visuo-spatial working memory task and presented block-wise distractor displays after working memory contents had been updated by means of a retroactive cue (retro-cue). Retroactive attention attenuated the interfering effect of distractors on memory precision. The reduction of working memory load by means of a selective retro-cue was reflected by a decline of a negative slow wave over parietal sites. Posterior N1 to the distractor was reduced following a selective retro-cue compared to a neutral retro-cue condition, most notably at left hemispheric sites. P3b referred to the distractor was suppressed completely only following a selective retro-cue. This suggests that focusing on only a subset of visuo-spatial information represented in working memory releases cognitive resources for preventing the in-depth processing of subsequently irrelevant visual events, thereby inhibiting their transfer into working memory. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0301-0511 1873-6246 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.006 |