The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States

Prior interventions have repeatedly failed to decrease the prescription and receipt of treatments and procedures that confer more harm than benefit at the End-of-Life (EoL); new approaches to intervention are needed. Ideally, future interventions would be informed by a social-ecological conceptual m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial science & medicine (1982) Vol. 317; p. 115546
Main Authors Duberstein, Paul R., Hoerger, Michael, Norton, Sally A., Mohile, Supriya, Dahlberg, Britt, Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt, Epstein, Ronald M., Wittink, Marsha N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Prior interventions have repeatedly failed to decrease the prescription and receipt of treatments and procedures that confer more harm than benefit at the End-of-Life (EoL); new approaches to intervention are needed. Ideally, future interventions would be informed by a social-ecological conceptual model that explains EoL healthcare utilization patterns, but current models ignore two facts: (1) healthcare is an inherently social activity, involving clinical teams and patients' social networks, and (2) emotions influence social activity. To address these omissions, we scaffolded Terror Management Theory and Socioemotional Selectivity Theory to create the Transtheoretical Model of Irrational Biomedical Exuberance (TRIBE). Based on Terror Management Theory, TRIBE suggests that the prospect of patient death motivates healthcare teams to conform to a biomedical norm of care, even when clinicians believe that biomedical interventions will likely be unhelpful. Based on Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, TRIBE suggests that the prospect of dwindling time motivates families to prioritize emotional goals, and leads patients to consent to disease-directed treatments they know will likely be unhelpful, as moral emotions motivate deference to the perceived emotional needs of their loved ones. TRIBE is unique among models of healthcare utilization in its acknowledgement that moral emotions and processes (e.g., shame, compassion, regret-avoidance) influence healthcare delivery, patients' interactions with family members, and patients’ outcomes. TRIBE is especially relevant to potentially harmful EoL care in the United States, and it also offers insights into the epidemics of overtreatment in healthcare settings worldwide. By outlining the role of socioemotional processes in the care of persons with serious conditions, TRIBE underscores the critical need for psychological innovation in interventions, health policy and research on healthcare utilization. •Many interventions, treatments and procedures confer more harm than benefit at the End-of-Life.•To explain why this happens, we developed the Transtheoretical Model of Irrational Biomedical Exuberance (TRIBE).•The TRIBE model highlights the role of moral emotions (e.g., guilt), motives (regret-avoidance) and processes (e.g., compassion) in healthcare.•TRIBE underscores the critical need for psychological innovation in healthcare delivery and the education of health professionals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0277-9536
1873-5347
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115546