Simple SARS-CoV-2 concentration methods for wastewater surveillance in low resource settings

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) measures pathogens in wastewater to monitor infectious disease prevalence in communities. Due to the high dilution of pathogens in sewage, a concentration method is often required to achieve reliable biomarker signals. However, most of the current concentration me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 912; p. 168782
Main Authors Dehghan Banadaki, Mohammad, Torabi, Soroosh, Rockward, Alexus, Strike, William D., Noble, Ann, Keck, James W., Berry, Scott M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 20.02.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) measures pathogens in wastewater to monitor infectious disease prevalence in communities. Due to the high dilution of pathogens in sewage, a concentration method is often required to achieve reliable biomarker signals. However, most of the current concentration methods rely on expensive equipment and labor-intensive processes, which limits the application of WBE in low-resource settings. Here, we compared the performance of four inexpensive and simple concentration methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples: Solid Fraction, Porcine Gastric Mucin-conjugated Magnetic Beads, Calcium Flocculation-Citrate Dissolution (CFCD), and Nanotrap® Magnetic Beads (NMBs). The NMBs and CFCD methods yielded the highest concentration performance for SARS-CoV-2 (∼16-fold concentration and ∼ 41 % recovery) and require <45 min processing time. CFCD has a relatively low consumable cost (<$2 per four sample replicates). All methods can be performed with basic laboratory equipment and minimal electricity usage which enables further application of WBE in remote areas and low resource settings. [Display omitted] •Application of WBE in low-resource settings is limited due to the complex and expensive equipment and processing techniques.•Four simple and inexpensive virus concentration methods were compared to recover SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater.•Calcium Flocculation-Citrate Dissolution and Nanotrap® Magnetic Beads showed the highest recovery efficiency of SARS-CoV-2.•Nanotrap® Beads offer electricity-free use, but Calcium Flocculation-Citrate Dissolution had the lowest time and cost burden.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168782