Attachment-related dimensions in the epigenetic era: A systematic review of the human research

•13 studies of association between attachment and DNAm in human were identified.•DNAm (OXTR, NR3C1, FKBP5, SLC6A4, HTR3A) is associated with attachment.•DNAm and attachment might affect the children's social and emotional development.•Clinical implications and future directions in epigenetics r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 125; pp. 654 - 666
Main Authors Craig, Francesco, Tenuta, Flaviana, Rizzato, Veronica, Costabile, Angela, Trabacca, Antonio, Montirosso, Rosario
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•13 studies of association between attachment and DNAm in human were identified.•DNAm (OXTR, NR3C1, FKBP5, SLC6A4, HTR3A) is associated with attachment.•DNAm and attachment might affect the children's social and emotional development.•Clinical implications and future directions in epigenetics research are proposed. In recent years, an increasing number of studies documented potential links between parental care and epigenetic mechanisms. The present systematic review focuses on the potential association and interrelationship between attachment-related dimensions and DNA methylation in human studies. We performed a literature review using electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost. Thirteen papers were included in the review. Findings support significant associations between attachment-related dimensions and epigenetic status in studies which considered different populations, age ranges, attachment measures and peripheral tissues. Although research in this area is still under investigation, available results suggest that DNA methylation associated with attachment-related dimensions might affect the development of stress regulation system and social-emotional capacities, thus contributing to the emerging phenotypic outcomes. However, identifying mediator and moderator effects in the interrelationship between these parameters was problematic owing to heterogeneous methodologies. Finally, we discuss clinical implications, unanswered questions, and future directions for human development in epigenetics research.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.006