A Parametric Analysis of Procedural Fidelity Errors Following Mastery of a Task: A Translational Study

• Published in: Journal of applied behavior analysis Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 607 - 617
• Main Authors: Falakfarsa, Galan, Brand, Denys, Bensemann, Joshua, Jones, Lea, Miguel, Caio F, Heinicke, Megan R, Mason, Makenna A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley 01.06.2023
• Subjects: Accuracy; Barriers; College Students; Error Patterns; Fidelity; Humans; Learning; Learning Processes; Mastery Learning; Skill Development; Students; Task Analysis; parametric analysis; mastered task; procedural fidelity; conditional discrimination; treatment fidelity
• ISSN: 0021-8855; 1938-3703
• DOI: 10.1002/jaba.992

Procedural fidelity is defined as the extent to which the independent variable is implemented as prescribed. Research using computerized tasks has shown that fidelity errors involving consequences for behavior can hinder skill acquisition. However, studies examining the effects of these errors once skills have been mastered are lacking. Thus, this translational study investigated the effects of varying levels of fidelity following mastery of a computerized arbitrary matching-to-sample task. A group design (consisting of five groups) was used in which college students initially completed 250 trials during which no programmed errors (i.e., perfect fidelity) were arranged, followed by an additional 250 trials with consequences delivered across various levels of fidelity (i.e., 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of trials administered without errors). The results showed that participants assigned to higher fidelity conditions performed better (on average). These results extended the findings of previous studies by demonstrating how errors involving consequences affect behavior across various stages of learning.