Reciprocity and Constructions of Informed Consent: Researching with Indigenous Populations

In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional review boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with Indigenous po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of qualitative methods Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors Ellis, Jason Brent, Earley, Mark A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2006
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Ethics
Indigenous peoples
Indigenous populations
Informed consent
Interviews
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative research
Reciprocity
Research ethics
Research methods
Research subjects
Researcher subject relations
Review boards
Traditions
interview research
First Nations
human subjects research
research ethics
Indigenous peoples
institutional review boards
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional review boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with Indigenous populations, whose culture and traditions might be quite different from those review boards typically see. After presenting these issues, the authors close with a framework that can be used as a guide for ethical considerations in research with Indigenous peoples.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1609-4069
1609-4069
DOI:10.1177/160940690600500401