Estimation of tissue perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging: simulation-based evaluation of the steepest slope method

Objective Tissue perfusion is frequently determined from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI image series by means of the steepest slope method. It was thus the aim of this study to systematically evaluate the reliability of this analysis method on the basis of simulated tissue curves. Methods 9600...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 2166 - 2175
Main Authors Brix, Gunnar, Zwick, Stefan, Griebel, Jürgen, Fink, Christian, Kiessling, Fabian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.09.2010
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Tissue perfusion is frequently determined from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI image series by means of the steepest slope method. It was thus the aim of this study to systematically evaluate the reliability of this analysis method on the basis of simulated tissue curves. Methods 9600 tissue curves were simulated for four noise levels, three sampling intervals and a wide range of physiological parameters using an axially distributed reference model and subsequently analysed by the steepest slope method. Results Perfusion is systematically underestimated with errors becoming larger with increasing perfusion and decreasing intravascular volume. For curves sampled after rapid contrast injection with a temporal resolution of 0.72 s, the bias was less than 23% when the mean residence time of tracer molecules in the intravascular distribution space was greater than 6 s. Increasing the sampling interval and the noise level substantially reduces the accuracy and precision of estimates, respectively. Conclusions The steepest slope method allows absolute quantification of tissue perfusion in a computationally simple and numerically robust manner. The achievable degree of accuracy and precision is considered to be adequate for most clinical applications.
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-010-1787-6