Lipid emulsion infusion rescues dogs from bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity

Background and Objectives: We previously demonstrated in rats that intravenous infusion of a lipid emulsion increases survival in resuscitation from severe bupivacaine cardiac toxicity. The present studies were undertaken to determine if this method is similarly effective in a non-rodent model using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRegional anesthesia and pain medicine Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 198 - 202
Main Authors Weinberg, Guy, Ripper, Richard, Feinstein, Douglas L., Hoffman, William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 01.05.2003
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives: We previously demonstrated in rats that intravenous infusion of a lipid emulsion increases survival in resuscitation from severe bupivacaine cardiac toxicity. The present studies were undertaken to determine if this method is similarly effective in a non-rodent model using a larger animal. Methods: Bupivacaine, 10 mg/kg, was administered intravenously over 10 seconds to fasted dogs under isoflurane general anesthesia. Resuscitation included 10 minutes of internal cardiac massage followed with either saline or 20% lipid infusion, administered as a 4-mL/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion at 0.5 mL/kg/min for 10 minutes. Electrocardiogram (EKG), arterial blood pressure (BP), and myocardial pH (pHm) and pO2 (pmO2) were continuously measured. Results: Survival after 10 minutes of unsuccessful cardiac massage was successful for all lipid-treated dogs (n = 6), but with no survivors in the saline controls (n = 6) (P < .01). Hemodynamics, PmO2, and pHm were improved during resuscitation with lipid compared with saline treatment in which dogs did not recover. Conclusions: We found that infusing a lipid emulsion during resuscitation from bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity substantially improved hemodynamics, pmO2, and pHm and increased survival in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:198-202.
ISSN:1098-7339
1532-8651
DOI:10.1053/rapm.2003.50041