Evaluating the NDVI–Rainfall Relationship in Bisha Watershed, Saudi Arabia Using Non-Stationary Modeling Technique

• Published in: Atmosphere Vol. 12; no. 5; p. 593
• Main Authors: Mallick, Javed, AlMesfer, Mohammed K., Singh, Vijay P., Falqi, Ibrahim I., Singh, Chander Kumar, Alsubih, Majed, Kahla, Nabil Ben
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2021
• Subjects: Accuracy; Autocorrelation; Climate and vegetation; Climate change; Climatic data; Correlation; Data analysis; Ecology; Environmental science; geographically weighted regression; global OLS regression; Growing season; Hydrologic data; Investigations; Model accuracy; Modelling; Normalized difference vegetative index; Precipitation; Rain; Rainfall; Rainfall data; Regression models; Remote sensing; satellite observation rainfall CHIRPS product; Satellites; Spatial analysis; Spatial variability; Spatial variations; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Variables; Variance; Vegetation; Vegetation index; Watersheds; Wetlands; Saudi Arabia; China; Africa
• ISSN: 2073-4433; 2073-4433
• DOI: 10.3390/atmos12050593

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and rainfall data were used to model the spatial relationship between vegetation and rainfall. Their correlation in previous studies was typically based on a global regression model, which assumed that the correlation was constant across space. The NDVI–rainfall association, on the other hand, is spatially non-stationary, non-linear, scale-dependent, and influenced by local factors (e.g., soil background). In this study, two statistical methods are used in the modeling, i.e., traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and geographically weighted regression (GWR), to evaluate the NDVI–rainfall relationship. The GWR was implemented annually in the growing seasons of 2000 and 2016, using climate data (Normalized Vegetation Difference Index and rainfall). The NDVI–rainfall relationship in the studied Bisha watershed (an eco-sensitive zone with a complex landscape) was found to have a stable operating scale of around 12 km. The findings support the hypothesis that the OLS model’s average impression could not accurately represent local conditions. By addressing spatial non-stationarity, the GWR approach greatly improves the model’s accuracy and predictive ability. In analyzing the relationship between NDVI patterns and rainfall, our research has shown that GWR outperforms a global OLS model. This superiority stems primarily from the consideration of the relationship’s spatial variance across the study area. Global regression techniques such as OLS can overlook local details, implying that a large portion of the variance in NDVI is unexplained. It appears that rainfall is the most significant factor in deciding the distribution of vegetation in these regions. Furthermore, rainfall had weak relationships with areas predominantly located around wetlands, suggesting the need for additional factors to describe NDVI variations. The GWR method performed better in terms of accuracy, predictive power, and reduced residual autocorrelation. Thus, GWR is recommended as an explanatory and exploratory technique when relations between variables are subject to spatial variability. Since the GWR is a local form of spatial analysis that aligned to local conditions, it has the potential for more accurate prediction; however, a larger amount of data is needed to allow a reliable local fitting.