Windthrow disturbance impacts soil biogeochemistry and bacterial communities in a temperate forest

• Published in: Plant and soil Vol. 512; no. 1-2; pp. 395 - 408
• Main Authors: Waring, Bonnie G., Lancastle, Lena, Bell, Thomas, Bidartondo, Martin I., García-Díaz, Pablo, Lambin, Xavier, Vanguelova, Elena, Windram, Francis A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.07.2025; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agriculture; Bacteria; Biogeochemistry; Biomass; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biota; Carbon content; Carbon cycle; Carbon sequestration; Community structure; Coniferous forests; Ecology; Forests; Life Sciences; Microorganisms; Nutrient cycles; Pest outbreaks; Plant growth; Plant Physiology; Plant Sciences; Plant tissues; Research Article; Rhizosphere; Soil bacteria; Soil chemistry; Soil microorganisms; Soil pH; Soil Science & Conservation; Soils; Storms; Temperate forests; Trees; Wildfires; Windthrow; United Kingdom > UK; England; Soil bacteria; Windthrow; Roots; Carbon cycling; Disturbance
• ISSN: 0032-079X; 1573-5036
• DOI: 10.1007/s11104-024-07086-8

Aims Forests across the world are subject to disturbance via wind, wildfire, and pest and disease outbreaks. Yet we still have an incomplete understanding of how these stressors impact forest biota—particularly the soil microbes, which govern forest carbon and nutrient cycling. Methods Here, we investigated the impact of a severe windstorm on soil bacterial communities in Kielder Forest, a temperate coniferous forest in the north of England. Within ten individual sites, defined by common stand composition and topography, we established 50 m 2 plots in undisturbed stands, and in nearby stands that were moderately and/or severely disturbed by windthrow. Soils were sampled within each of the 22 study plots, and analysed for changes in carbon and nitrogen content, pH, root biomass, and bacterial community structure. We separately sequenced bacteria from bulk soils, rhizosphere soils, and root tissues to assess whether disturbance impacts varied based on the proximity of microbiota to tree roots. Results Less than a year after the storm, we found that the most severely disturbed stands had lower canopy cover, lower soil carbon content, higher soil pH, and a smaller fine root biomass than the undisturbed stands. Disturbance also impacted bacterial community beta-diversity, but the effects were subtle and did not vary among assemblages in bulk vs. rhizosphere soils. Conclusions Impacts of aboveground disturbance on soil biogeochemistry can be significant, but soil bacterial communities are relatively well-buffered against these changes. However, altered patterns of root growth and carbon cycling may have longer-term implications for forest recovery after windthrow disturbances.