Triangulation in Organizational Research: A Re-Presentation

This paper extends the discussion of postmodern thinking in organizational theory through a re-presentation of the concept of triangulation in organizational research. Initially triangulation is defined through the contrasting lenses of positivism and post-positivism/postmodernism and analysed as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganization (London, England) Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 109 - 133
Main Authors Cox, Julie Wolfram, Hassard, John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2005
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper extends the discussion of postmodern thinking in organizational theory through a re-presentation of the concept of triangulation in organizational research. Initially triangulation is defined through the contrasting lenses of positivism and post-positivism/postmodernism and analysed as a metaphor for fixing and capturing the research subject. Subsequently triangulation is ‘re-presented’ as ‘metaphorization’—in terms of process and movement between researcher-subject positions. Rethinking the lines and angles of enquiry in triangulation, the paper suggests a shift from the ‘triangulation of distance’ tradition to a more reflexive consideration of ‘researcher stance’. This movement is represented across three perspectives: the researcher as a follower of nomothetic lines; the researcher as the taker of an ideographic overview; and the researcher as the finder of a particular angle. The implications of this re-presentation are then discussed in terms of perspective, data capture, reflexivity and metatriangulation.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1350-5084
1461-7323
DOI:10.1177/1350508405048579