Ethnic Variability in Glycemic Response to Sucrose and Isomaltulose

The aim of this study was to compare the glycemic response of Caucasians and Asians to two disaccharides of different glycemic index (GI), and to examine if ethnic groups that showed the largest glycemic response to sucrose would benefit the most when it is replaced with isomaltulose. Forty healthy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNutrients Vol. 9; no. 4; p. 347
Main Authors Tan, Wei Shuan Kimberly, Tan, Sze-Yen, Henry, Christiani Jeyakumar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 01.04.2017
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare the glycemic response of Caucasians and Asians to two disaccharides of different glycemic index (GI), and to examine if ethnic groups that showed the largest glycemic response to sucrose would benefit the most when it is replaced with isomaltulose. Forty healthy participants (10 Chinese; 10 Malays; 10 Caucasians; and 10 Indians) consumed beverages containing 50 g of sucrose or isomaltulose on two separate occasions using a randomized crossover design. Capillary blood glucose was measured in a fasted state and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after beverage ingestion. Glycemic response to sucrose was significantly higher in Malays compared to Caucasians ( = 0.041), but did not differ between Caucasians vs. Chinese ( = 0.145) or vs. Indians ( = 0.661). When sucrose was replaced with isomaltulose, glycemic responses were significantly reduced in all ethnic groups, with the largest reduction in glycemic response being observed in Malays. Malays, who had the greatest glycemic response to sucrose, also showed the greatest improvement in glycemic response when sucrose was replaced with isomaltulose. This implies that Malays who are more susceptible to type 2 diabetes mellitus may benefit from strategies that replace high GI carbohydrate with lower GI alternatives to assist in glycemic control.
ISSN:2072-6643
2072-6643
DOI:10.3390/nu9040347