Scrutinizing coupled vector dark energy in light of data

• Published in: Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics Vol. 2024; no. 4; pp. 16 - 52
• Main Authors: Cardona, Wilmar, Palacios-Córdoba, Jose L., Valenzuela-Toledo, César A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol IOP Publishing 01.04.2024
• Subjects: Astronomical models; Connectors; Cosmological constant; cosmological parameters from CMBR; Cosmological perturbation theory in GR and beyond; Cosmology; Couplings; Dark energy; dark energy theory; Dark matter; Energy; Energy equation; Equations of state; Fields (mathematics); Goodness of fit; Growth rate; modified gravity; Momentum; Parameters; Perturbation; Perturbations; Physics; Probability theory; Red shift
• ISSN: 1475-7516; 1475-7516
• DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/016

Abstract Since current challenges faced by ΛCDM might be hinting at new unravelled physics, here we investigate a plausible cosmological model where a vector field acts as source of dark energy. In particular, we examine whether an energy-momentum exchange between dark energy and dark matter could provide an explanation for current discrepancies in cosmological parameters. We carefully work out equations governing background and linear order perturbations and implement them in a Boltzmann code. We found that a negative coupling makes the dark energy equation of state less negative and closer to a cosmological constant during the matter dominated epoch than an uncoupled vector dark energy model. While the effect of the coupling is hardly noticeable through its effect on matter density perturbations, matter velocity perturbations and gravitational potentials are enhanced at late-times when dark energy dominates. Therefore, data of redshift space distortions help to narrow down these kinds of couplings in the dark sector. We computed cosmological constraints and found common parameters also present in ΛCDM are in good agreement with the Planck collaboration baseline result. Our best fit for a negatively coupled vector field predicts a higher growth rate of matter perturbations at low redshift, thus exacerbating the disagreement with redshift space distortions data. While a positively coupled vector field can lead to power suppression of P m ( k,z = 0) on small scales as well as a lower growth rate of matter perturbations than the standard model, it might compromise the goodness of fit to the CMB angular power spectrum on small scales. We conclude that our negatively coupled vector dark energy model does not solve current tensions (i.e., H 0 and σ 8 ). Moreover, having three additional parameters with respect to ΛCDM, the negatively coupled vector dark energy model is heavily disfavoured by Bayesian evidence.