Furrow-ridge mulching managements affect the yield, tuber quality and storage of continuous cropping potatoes

The effect of FP (a flat plot without mulch), FPM (a flat plot with film mulching), RM (on-ridge planting with full film mulching), and FM (on-furrow planting with full film mulching) on the tuber and its storage quality of continuous cropping potatoes was investigated. The results showed that with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant, soil and environment Vol. 66; no. 11; pp. 576 - 583
Main Authors Kang, Yichen, Zhang, Weina, Yang, Xinyu, Liu, Yuhui, Fan, Yanling, Shi, Mingfu, Yao, Kai, Qin, Shuhao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Prague Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) 01.01.2020
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of FP (a flat plot without mulch), FPM (a flat plot with film mulching), RM (on-ridge planting with full film mulching), and FM (on-furrow planting with full film mulching) on the tuber and its storage quality of continuous cropping potatoes was investigated. The results showed that with the increase of continuous cropping years, the potato yield was reduced year by year. The furrow-ridge mulching film can significantly increase potato yield and reduce small tubers. Among them, the yield of RM was the highest. From the perspective of tuber quality, RM had the highest dry matter content and starch content, while FP had the lowest. Meanwhile, the reducing sugar content of FP was always higher than that of other treatments. The amino acid content and vitamin C content of FPM, RM, and FM were higher than FP before and after storage. In addition, with the extension of storage time, the dry matter content, starch content, amino acid content, and vitamin C content of all treatments decreased, while the content of reducing sugar increased significantly. Thus, on-ridge planting with full film mulching (RM) can effectively improve potato yield and tuber quality before and after storage.
ISSN:1214-1178
1805-9368
DOI:10.17221/316/2020-PSE