Comparisons of equivalent dose values obtained with different protocols using a lacustrine sediment sample from Xuchang, China
Comparisons of seven protocols for equivalent dose ( D e) determination using the conventional optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal and the recuperation OSL (ReOSL) signal were made on a sample that is representative of a series of samples taken from a lacustrine sedimentary sequence at th...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiation measurements Vol. 44; no. 5; pp. 512 - 516 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2009
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Comparisons of seven protocols for equivalent dose (
D
e) determination using the conventional optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal and the recuperation OSL (ReOSL) signal were made on a sample that is representative of a series of samples taken from a lacustrine sedimentary sequence at the archaeological site of Xuchang Man. Fine-grained quartz (4–11
μm) was extracted and the OSL signal was found to be dominated by the fast component. The
D
e values obtained using different protocols varied from 222
±
4
Gy to 368
±
8
Gy. The dose response curves were all fitted with a single saturating exponential function except in the case of the multiple-aliquot additive dose protocol with sensitivity correction for the recuperated OSL signal (ReMAAD). The characteristic saturation dose (
D
0) values obtained with the conventional OSL signal varied between 107
±
6
Gy and 154
±
7
Gy and showed no relationship with
D
e values. The ReMAAD dose response curve was linear, and yielded an equivalent dose of 269
±
12
Gy. The ReMAAD protocol may potentially serve as a means of dating relatively older samples provided the bleaching at the time of deposition was complete. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1350-4487 1879-0925 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.06.002 |