Vapor pressure measurement for binary and ternary systems containing a phosphoric ionic liquid

Vapor pressure data were measured for nine binary systems containing water, methanol or ethanol with the ionic liquids 1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethylphosphate ([MMIM][DMP]), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate ([EMIM][DEP]) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dibutylphosphate ([BMIM][DBP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFluid phase equilibria Vol. 247; no. 1; pp. 190 - 198
Main Authors Zhao, Jin, Jiang, Xiao-Chuan, Li, Chun-Xi, Wang, Zi-Hao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.09.2006
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Vapor pressure data were measured for nine binary systems containing water, methanol or ethanol with the ionic liquids 1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethylphosphate ([MMIM][DMP]), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate ([EMIM][DEP]) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dibutylphosphate ([BMIM][DBP]) and one ternary system ethanol–water–[MMIM][DMP] at varying temperature and ionic liquid mass percent ranging from 10% to 70% by a quasi-static method. The vapor pressure data of the binary systems were correlated by NRTL model with overall average absolute relative deviation (ARD) of 0.89% and a maximum ARD within 2%. Based on the vapor pressure depression of binary systems interpolated at ionic liquid mole fraction 0.05 in the temperature range from 280 to 370 K, it is shown that the effect of ionic liquid on the vapor pressure lowering follows the order [MMIM][DMP] > [EMIM][DEP] > [BMIM][DBP] for water, and [BMIM][DBP] > [EMIM][DEP] > [MMIM][DMP] for methanol and ethanol, suggesting that the “ionic” characteristic of the ionic liquid dominates in water, while the “molecule” characteristic prevails in organic solvent. The binary NRTL parameters were used to predict the vapor pressure of the ternary system ethanol–water–[MMIM][DMP] with an ARD of 2.8% and the maximum relative deviation of −5.43%.
ISSN:0378-3812
1879-0224
DOI:10.1016/j.fluid.2006.07.007