Effectiveness of operative treatment of internal orbital wall fracture with polydioxanone implant

Many implants, some made from teflon or silicone, have been used for internal orbital wall reconstruction. Late complications relating to use of such implants have been reported. In this prospective study a polydioxanone (PDS) implant absorbable in vivo was used for internal orbital wall reconstruct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 278 - 285
Main Authors Kontio, R., Suuronen, R., Salonen, O., Paukku, P., Konttinen, Y.T., Lindqvist, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2001
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many implants, some made from teflon or silicone, have been used for internal orbital wall reconstruction. Late complications relating to use of such implants have been reported. In this prospective study a polydioxanone (PDS) implant absorbable in vivo was used for internal orbital wall reconstruction. Follow-up involved clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT). Clinical examinations were undertaken before operation and up to 36 weeks postoperatively. Sixteen consecutive patients (10 pure blow-out fractures, six with associated zygomatic fracture) took part in the study. Prevalences of diplopia, proptosis and enophthalmus were recorded during each follow-up examination. This study revealed no muscle entrapment within the fracture line. Although CT results confirmed bone growth in the internal orbital wall, shape was unsatisfactory, and orbital volume was not reduced. MRI revealed thick scar formations in six cases (37.5%), fibrotic sinuses filled with air or gas in three cases (19%) and a fibrotic sinus with fluid around the PDS in one case (6%). Our results suggest that use of PDS in reconstructing the internal orbital wall is inadvisable.
ISSN:0901-5027
1399-0020
DOI:10.1054/ijom.2001.0067