Teaching medical students how to break bad news: A Turkish experience

Background . To assess the effect of teaching breaking bad news. Methods . The session incorporated brainstorming, presentation, discussion, small-group exercises using standardized patients. Course was evaluated through a pre-objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), first post-OSCE (post-O...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cancer education Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 246 - 248
Main Authors Dikici, Mustafa Fevzi, Yaris, Fusun, Cubukcu, Mahcube
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer-Verlag 01.01.2009
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background . To assess the effect of teaching breaking bad news. Methods . The session incorporated brainstorming, presentation, discussion, small-group exercises using standardized patients. Course was evaluated through a pre-objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), first post-OSCE (post-OSCE1), second post-OSCE (post-OSCE2) (6 th month), and questionnaires. Results . Pre-OSCE, post-OSCE1, post-OSCE2 scores: preparing the environment 5.83 ±0.23, 7.93 ± 0.19, 9.78 ± 0.07; understanding what patient knows and wants to learn 1.83 ± 0.33, 6.47 ± 0.27, 9.68 ± 0.11; giving information 3.25 ± 0.34, 7.43 ± 0.19, 9.67 ± 0.10; developing empathy 2.50 ± 0.32, 6.92 ± 0.28, 9.87 ± 0.06; closing the interview 2.28 ± 0.28, 6.98 ± 0.25, 9.83 ±0.07. The differences between OSCEs were significant . In the questionnaire, 54.1% of 146 students perceived more competent. Conclusions . Course seems beneficial.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-8195
1543-0154
DOI:10.1080/08858190902972814