Interfacial adhesion mechanisms in incompatible semicrystalline polymer systems

• Published in: Journal of polymer science. Part B, Polymer physics Vol. 42; no. 14; pp. 2667 - 2679
• Main Authors: Lo, Chieh-Tsung, Laabs, Francis C., Narasimhan, Balaji
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 15.07.2004; Wiley
• Subjects: Applied sciences; crystallization; Exact sciences and technology; fracture energy; interdiffusion; Organic polymers; Physicochemistry of polymers; polyolefins; Properties and characterization; semicrystalline polymer interfaces; Surface properties; TEM; semicrystalline polymer interfaces; Polydispersed polymer; Solid solid interface; Propylene polymer; Experimental study; Property processing relationship; Adhesion; Mechanism; interdiffusion; Interface properties; polyolefins; Isotactic polymer; crystallization; Thermal annealing; Fracture energy; TEM; Linear low density ethylene polymer; Bilayers
• ISSN: 0887-6266; 1099-0488
• DOI: 10.1002/polb.20148

The mechanism of adhesion at semicrystalline polymer interfaces between isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and linear low‐density polyethylene (PE) was studied with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and an asymmetric‐double‐cantilever‐beam test. From the TEM images, both the interfacial width and the lamellar thickness of the polymers were extracted. During annealing, the interfacial width increased with the annealing temperature, and this indicated the accumulation of amorphous polymers at the interface. The interfacial strength, determined from the critical fracture energy (Gc), also increased with the annealing temperature and reached a maximum above the melting temperatures of iPP and PE, whereas the smallest Gc value was obtained below the melting temperatures of the two materials. A mechanism of interfacial strengthening was proposed accounting for the competition between the interdiffusion of PE and crystallization of iPP. As the annealing temperature increased, the rates of PE diffusion and iPP crystallization increased. Although the crystallization of iPP hindered the interdiffusion of PE, both the interfacial width and the fracture energy increased with the temperature, and this indicated that PE interdiffusion dominated iPP crystallization. Below the critical temperature, the fracture surfaces of both iPP and PE were smooth, and chain pullout dominated the fracture mechanism. Above the critical temperature, iPP crystallization still hindered the interdiffusion, and crazes could be seen on the iPP side. Above the melting temperatures of the two materials, ruptured surfaces could also be seen on the PE side, and crazing was the fracture mechanism. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2667–2679, 2004