Soil sample collection and analysis for the Fugitive Dust Characterization Study

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) Vol. 37; no. 9; pp. 1163 - 1173
• Main Authors: Ashbaugh, Lowell L, Carvacho, Omar F, Brown, Michael S, Chow, Judith C, Watson, John G, Magliano, Karen C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2003
• Subjects: Dust emission; PM 10; PM 2.5; Soil dust; Source profiles; PM 10; Dust emission; Source profiles; Soil dust; PM 2.5
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01022-1

A unique set of soil samples was collected as part of the Fugitive Dust Characterization Study. The study was carried out to establish whether or not source profiles could be constructed using novel analytical methods that could distinguish soil dust sources from each other. The soil sources sampled included fields planted in cotton, almond, tomato, grape, and safflower, dairy and feedlot facilities, paved and unpaved roads (both urban and rural), an agricultural staging area, disturbed land with salt buildup, and construction areas where the topsoil had been removed. The samples were collected using a systematic procedure designed to reduce sampling bias, and were stored frozen to preserve possible organic signatures. For this paper the samples were characterized by particle size (percent sand, silt, and clay), dry silt content (used in EPA-recommended fugitive dust emission factors), carbon and nitrogen content, and potential to emit both PM 10 and PM 2.5. These are not the “novel analytical methods” referred to above; rather, it was the basic characterization of the samples to use in comparing analytical methods by other scientists contracted to the California Air Resources Board. The purpose of this paper is to document the methods used to collect the samples, the collection locations, the analysis of soil type and potential to emit PM 10, and the sample variability, both within field and between fields of the same crop type.