The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results

Hemolyzed specimens are rejected for coagulation testing based on concerns of artifactual interference. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and selected factor assay test results for consecutive pairs of hemolyzed and subsequently recollected (mean, 72 minutes later)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of clinical pathology Vol. 126; no. 5; pp. 748 - 755
Main Authors LAGA, Alvaro C, CHEVES, Tracey A, SWEENEY, Joseph D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL American Society of Clinical Pathologists 01.11.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hemolyzed specimens are rejected for coagulation testing based on concerns of artifactual interference. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and selected factor assay test results for consecutive pairs of hemolyzed and subsequently recollected (mean, 72 minutes later) nonhemolyzed patient specimens were compared. Specimens from healthy human subjects were subjected to mechanically induced hemolysis, and PT and aPTT results compared with concurrently drawn nonhemolyzed control samples. In 50 paired patient specimens, there were statistically significant differences in PT (15.8 +/- 8.4 vs 16.3 +/- 8.7 seconds, P < .01) and aPTT (31.6 +/- 18 vs 32.5 +/- 19 seconds, P < .01) between hemolyzed and nonhemolyzed specimens, respectively. Specimens from healthy subjects showed no difference in PT and a minor difference in aPTT. A policy of rejecting hemolyzed specimens for coagulation tests should be revisited because the observed difference, when present, is unlikely to be considered clinically meaningful.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9173
1943-7722
DOI:10.1309/03FK3378YTRA1FRF