Pain Intensity, Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity, Central Sensitization, and Pain Catastrophizing Related to Vascular Alterations in Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Preliminary Case–Control Study

Abstract Objective To evaluate pain intensity, widespread pressure pain, central sensitization (CS), and catastrophizing between subjects with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) and healthy controls and to compare the relationships between vascular impairment and pain perception. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 891 - 901
Main Authors Tapia-Haro, Rosa Maria, Guisado-Barrilao, Rafael, Garcia-Rios, Maria del Carmen, lvarez, Enrique Raya-A, Perez-Marmol, Jose Manuel, Aguilar-Ferrandiz, Maria Encarnacion
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To evaluate pain intensity, widespread pressure pain, central sensitization (CS), and catastrophizing between subjects with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) and healthy controls and to compare the relationships between vascular impairment and pain perception. Methods A preliminary case–control study was performed with a total sample of 57 participants (37 with RP). Sociodemographic data, clinical/vascular data, and pain variables (pain intensity, pressure pain sensitivity, pain magnitude and threshold, CS, and catastrophizing) were registered. Results were analyzed by analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation. Results Participants with RP had a lower basal temperature (more vasoconstriction) in their hands (P ≤ 0.012), higher pain intensity (P ≤ 0.001), higher electrical pain magnitude (P < 0.001), and lower pressure pain (P ≤ 0.05) and electrical pain (P < 0.001) thresholds in comparison with healthy controls. Secondary RP participants showed a significantly higher level of CS compared with controls and primary RP participants (P = 0.001). Catastrophizing was higher in the primary and secondary RP (P ≤ 0.001) groups than in controls. No correlations were observed between severity of vasoconstriction and pain variables. Conclusions RP participants showed bilateral hypersensitivity to pressure pain. However, the severity of vascular alterations seems not to be related to central pain experiences. Additional mechanisms such as catastrophizing may influence pain in RP; nevertheless, central sensitization only appears to be involved in the secondary form of RP.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1526-2375
1526-4637
DOI:10.1093/pm/pnz089