Problem-Solving Therapy Versus Supportive Therapy in Geriatric Major Depression With Executive Dysfunction

The authors compared the efficacy of problem-solving therapy (PST) and supportive therapy (ST) in a group of elderly subjects with impairment in executive functions. This group was targeted because it has been shown to be at the risk for poor response to pharmacotherapy. A total of 25 elderly subjec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 46 - 52
Main Authors Alexopoulos, George S., Raue, Patrick, Areán, Patricia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 01.01.2003
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1064-7481
1545-7214
DOI10.1097/00019442-200301000-00007

Cover

More Information
Summary:The authors compared the efficacy of problem-solving therapy (PST) and supportive therapy (ST) in a group of elderly subjects with impairment in executive functions. This group was targeted because it has been shown to be at the risk for poor response to pharmacotherapy. A total of 25 elderly subjects with major depression and abnormal scores in initiation/perseveration and response inhibition tasks were randomly assigned to receive weekly sessions of PST or ST for 12 weeks. The subjects were systematically evaluated by raters blind to the study hypotheses. PST was more effective than ST in leading to remission of depression, fewer post-treatment depressive symptoms, and less disability. A substantial part of the change in depression and disability was explained by the subjects' improvement of skills in generating alternatives and in decision-making. This preliminary study suggests that PST is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and disability in elderly patients with major depression and executive dysfunction. If these findings are confirmed, PST may become an important therapeutic alternative for a patient population who may otherwise remain symptomatic and disabled.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1064-7481
1545-7214
DOI:10.1097/00019442-200301000-00007