Subconscious stereotyping in personnel decisions

This study contends that despite knowledge of the legal aspects of discrimination, people in the workplace are still discriminating - unconsciously - on the basis of race or sex in decisions involving such matters as selection, placement, promotion, training, and compensation. Sex is used as the key...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBusiness horizons Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 60 - 66
Main Author Kovach, Kenneth A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Greenwich Elsevier Inc 01.09.1982
Elsevier Advanced Technology Publications
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-6813
1873-6068
DOI10.1016/0007-6813(82)90064-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study contends that despite knowledge of the legal aspects of discrimination, people in the workplace are still discriminating - unconsciously - on the basis of race or sex in decisions involving such matters as selection, placement, promotion, training, and compensation. Sex is used as the key variable in this study. A sample of 512 soon-to-graduate college students (271 males and 241 females) were surveyed while taking a Personnel Management course that taught them the legal aspects of employment discrimination. Subjects were asked to react to 8 incidents in which they were supposed to make a personnel decision. Incidents were presented using either male or female primary subjects. Half the males and half the females were given the ''female version''; the other students were given the ''male version''. Study results showed that most believed the male should place job responsibilities first and that home responsibilities should come first for females. Males were viewed as more valuable employees than females, even when their qualifications were exactly the same. The conclusion was that through subtle forms of unintentional sex discrimination, organizations hire enough females to comply with the law, but do not allow females to develop managerially to the same extent as equally qualified males.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0007-6813
1873-6068
DOI:10.1016/0007-6813(82)90064-7