Mississippi moisture budgets on regional scales

• Published in: Monthly weather review Vol. 127; no. 11; pp. 2654 - 2673
• Main Authors: BERBERY, E. H, RASMUSSON, E. M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston, MA American Meteorological Society 01.11.1999
• Subjects: Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; External geophysics; Meteorology; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation); Mississippi River Basin; United States; North America; America; Mississippi River Basin, Central U.S; Mesoscale; Annual variation; Water balance; Evaporation; Diurnal variation; Eta model; Data assimilation; Water cycle
• ISSN: 0027-0644; 1520-0493
• DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<2654:MMBORS>2.0.CO;2

Two years of regional analyses based on the Eta Data Assimilation System (EDAS) are used to examine the mesoscale features of the moisture budgets of the Mississippi River basin and its subbasins. Despite the short period, basic aspects of the regional-scale seasonal means, annual cycle, and even diurnal cycle of the atmospheric water cycle are represented. The ability of the Eta Model to resolve mesoscale features of the low-level circulation is an important factor in improving the estimates of moisture flux convergence at regional scales. It appears that the internal consistency of moisture budgets estimated from EDAS analyses for basins of nearly 5 x 10 super(5) km super(2) is comparable to that computed from radiosondes for basins of about 2 x 10 super(6) km super(2) or larger. In other terms, the spatial scale of basins where consistent moisture budgets can be estimated appears to be reduced by almost one order of magnitude. Area-averaged evaporation estimates (computed as residuals of the moisture budget equation) for basins of about 5 x 10 super(5) km super(2) range from near zero during winter in the northern subbasins to about 5-6 mm day super(-) super(1) during summer in the southern subbasin. It is suggested that the slightly negative estimates of evaporation in the northern subbasins during winter may partly result from an underestimation of observed precipitation due to the combined effect of wind and solid precipitation. No attempt was made at computing the model's moisture budget, since changes in the surface parameterizations prevented having a period long enough to achieve stable results. Broad aspects of the diurnal cycle during summer were also examined through nighttime-daytime differences. Consistent with other studies over the central United States, results show that the nighttime development of moisture flux convergence is associated with an increase of intensity of the low-level jet. Interestingly, the nighttime convergence of moisture flux is offset by divergence during daytime and, as a result, overall moisture flux divergence is observed during summer. A comparative analysis was made of the observed and model forecast precipitation to assess the model's overall performance during the 2-yr period. It was found that the spatial patterns, intensity, and even the broad aspects of the summertime diurnal cycle of the model forecast precipitation are similar to those observed. Nevertheless, some deficiencies exist: a dry bias was obtained over the central United States during summer and winter; during summer, the southeastern United States had an excess of precipitation similar to that observed in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction global model; during winter, forecast precipitation in the northwestern United States appears to have biases in location and intensity, which can be related to the large-scale component of the model precipitation.