Rationale for Prospective Assays of Intrathecal Mixtures Including Morphine, Ropivacaine and Ziconotide: Prevention of Adverse Events and Feasibility in Clinical Practice
Use of intrathecal admixtures is widespread, but compounding these is sometimes challenging and may result in errors and complications causing super-potency or sub potency adverse events in patients or malfunctions in the pump itself. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of compound...
Saved in:
Published in | Pain physician Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 349 - 357 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society of Interventional Pain Physician
01.07.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Use of intrathecal admixtures is widespread, but compounding these is sometimes challenging and may result in errors and complications causing super-potency or sub potency adverse events in patients or malfunctions in the pump itself.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of compounding of intrathecal admixtures through a prospective, systematic quantitative analysis of each component of the mixture before delivery to patients.
Observational follow up prospective study of intrathecal mixtures components concentrations before refills.
Assays were performed on all intrathecal admixtures produced by the ICO-Paul Papin compounding pharmacy between January 2013 and October 2014 using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (U.H.P.L.C.). In addition, pH levels of admixtures have been measured since June 2014. When measured concentrations were 15% above or below the required concentrations, the mixture was excluded and compounded again.
1729 mixtures were analyzed. Mean deviation from theoretical values was -1.17% ± 0.28% for morphine, -0.95% ± 1.07% for ropivacaine, and 4.82% ± 0.6% for ziconotide. Exclusion rates were 8.33% overall, but fell from 11.67% in 2013 to 4.97% in 2014. Most exclusions were caused by inaccuracy in the dose of ziconotide. Average mixture pH of the 603 tested admixtures was 4.83 ± 0.6%.
This study is monocentric and limitations include also its non-randomized nature with no clinical comparison of the rate of adverse events with a refill process without control of each component concentrations.
Prospective assays provide benefits in ensuring accuracy of intrathecal mixture compounding and in preventing overdosing or sub dosing, most notably concerning Ziconotide. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1533-3159 2150-1149 |
DOI: | 10.36076/ppj.2015/18/349 |