Waste management assessment in Geneva through material system and resource analysis

In the canton of Geneva, public authorities use infrastructural and persuasive instruments to favour household waste sorting. The cantonal fund for waste management (CFWM) partly finances these policy instruments. The aim of this study is to assess household waste management (WM) in Geneva with a fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of material cycles and waste management Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 645 - 655
Main Author Bergeron, Francis C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Japan 2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Civil Engineering
Engineering
Environmental Management
Financial management
Garbage collection
Households
Operating costs
Policy analysis
Regional Case Study
Resource management
Systems analysis
Waste disposal
Waste management
Waste management industry
Waste Management/Waste Technology
Waste sorting
Resources
Household waste management
Material system analysis
Policy analysis
Canton of Geneva
Assessment
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the canton of Geneva, public authorities use infrastructural and persuasive instruments to favour household waste sorting. The cantonal fund for waste management (CFWM) partly finances these policy instruments. The aim of this study is to assess household waste management (WM) in Geneva with a focus on waste sorting and the operation of the CFWM. This study relies on a new assessment method which combines material system analysis and policy analysis. This combination analyses how the resources used for household WM influence the state of the WM system. The assessment shows that the resources used by public authorities led to a growth in waste sorted and a decrease in waste incinerated in Geneva over the period 2002–2013. This trend, combined with a strong decrease in imported waste, induced the monopolisation by waste collection centres of the available funds in the CFWM budget at the expense of cantonal raising awareness. The assessment leads to two recommendations for decision makers. First, a policy instrument mix based on infrastructural and persuasive instruments constitutes an effective approach to favour waste sorting by households. Second, the use of a “disposal tax” does not constitute a sustainable approach to finance the operating costs of the sorting infrastructure.
ISSN:1438-4957
1611-8227
DOI:10.1007/s10163-016-0578-9